[Autoliste] Re: Par atsevišķiem CSN pārkāpumiem "aizrobežā"

Ginc ginc at pie-dabas.net
Thu Oct 6 10:41:34 EEST 2011


Par fotoradara bildi iekš EE nekas nepienāk. Netīšam šogad pārbaudīts
apmēram ar 94kmh.

G.

On 2011.10.06. 10:37, Krescendo Paranoja wrote:
> Vismaz Igaunija ir noslēgusi līgumu ar Creditreform līdzīgu priekšmetu
> par sodu piedzīšanu, t.i., ja Tallinā ar .lv numuriem atrausies
> plāksteri, vietējie piedzīs Ls 40,00.
> Latvija plāksterus auto ar eestu numuriem piedzīt nemāk, t.i., ja nav
> klamburs uz riteņa, min droši tālāk.
> 
> KH,
> pirms gada Francijā sabildēts, bet nekas... nekas... nekas... :D
>  
> 
> 
> Citējot *Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv> <mailto:Odze at baltinet.lv>*:
> 
>     23-25.septembrii biju Lietuvaa un likaas, ka mani nofocheeja radars.
>     Bija neliels aatruma paarsniegums :(
> 
>     Vai tas noziimee, ka taa kaa direktiiva ir no 29.septembra, vai
>     es varu buut mieriiga un man fotograafija uz maajaam netiks
>     nosuutiita? :)
> 
>     Evija
> 
> 
> 
>     On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:59:43 +0300, Imants wrote:
> 
>         Sveiki, ļautiņi!
>         Tas brīdis nu ir pienācis un tuvāko 2 gadu laikā tiks ieviests
>         mehānisms, lai dalībvalsts operatīvi noskaidrotu, kurš ir tas
>         ārvalstnieks, kas ir izdarījis kādu no 4 veidu CSN pārkāpumiem.
>         Potenciāla "haļava" gan vēl saglabāsies DK un Latvijas
>         satelītrepublikās UK un IRL... 
>          
>         COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
>          
>         Brussels, 29 September 2011
>         14413/11
>         PRESSE 316
>          
>         Directive on cross-border exchange of information on road
>         safety offences adopted
>          
>         The Council today adopted, on the basis of a text agreed with
>         the European Parliament in
>         second reading, a directive on cross-border exchange of
>         information on road traffic
>         offences (44/11, 14251/11 ADD 1 + ADD 2). Member states will
>         have two years following
>         the publication of the directive in the EU's Official Journal to
>         transpose it into their
>         national legislation.
>         The objective of this directive is to combat road traffic
>         offences that considerably
>         jeopardise road safety, by facilitating cross-border exchange of
>         information. A member
>         state in which an offence has been committed with a vehicle
>         registered in another member
>         state will be able to identify the holder of the vehicle and
>         investigate who is personally
>         liable for the offence, so that sanctions can be enforced. This
>         will also help ensure equal
>         treatment of drivers irrespective of their country of residence.
>         According to an impact
>         assessment carried out by the Commission, up to 5 000 lives
>         could be saved every year by
>         the application of such a measure.
>         The directive covers the four traffic offences which cause the
>         most road casualties in
>         Europe, namely speeding, driving under the influence of alcohol
>         or drugs, non-use of a seat
>         belt and failing to stop at a red light. According to the
>         Commission's impact assessment
>         study completed in 2007, which gives estimates for the year
>         2004, 30% of road deaths
>         were caused by speeding, 25% by drink-driving, 17% by non-use of
>         seat belts, and around
>         4% by failing to stop at a red traffic light. In other words,
>         some 75% of all road deaths are
>         caused by one (or more) of these four traffic offences. Three
>         further offences also fall
>         within the scope of the directive: failing to wear a safety
>         helmet, use of a forbidden lane
>         (such as emergency or public transport lanes), and illegally
>         using a mobile phone while
>         driving. The list may be extended in the future through a
>         revision of the directive.
>          
>         Under the new legislation, member states will allow each other
>         access to vehicle
>         registration data for identification of the holder or owner of
>         the vehicle with which the
>         offence has been committed. Once that person is identified, the
>         member state in which the
>         traffic offence took place will send him or her a letter setting
>         out the details of the offence
>         committed and the fine imposed in accordance with its law. In
>         any case, it will depend on
>         the member state in which the offence has been committed and on
>         its national law to
>         determine whether and how the offence will be prosecuted.
>         The United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark, due to their special
>         position under the Lisbon
>         treaty with regard to policy cooperation, do not participate in
>         this measure, but may decide
>         to join in later.
>         Currently, traffic offences are often not punished if they are
>         committed with a vehicle
>         which is registered in a member state other than the member
>         state where the offence has
>         been committed, in particular if the offences are automatically
>         registered using road-side
>         cameras without direct contact between the driver and the
>         police. Public acceptance of a
>         general legal enforcement is vital if casualties are to be
>         reduced. Such acceptance, though,
>         may be undermined if there is a general feeling that
>         non-resident drivers are not held
>         responsible for the offences they commit. While non-residents
>         represent around 5% of the
>         road users in the EU countries for which such data are
>         available, the proportion of nonresident
>         drivers committing speeding offences is in the range of 2.5% to
>         30% (2.5% in Denmark, 4% in Finland,
>          6% in the Netherlands, 8% in Catalonia (Spain), 14% in Belgium,
>         15% in France, 
>         and 30% in Luxembourg). These figures suggest that non-resident
>         drivers are relatively more 
>         involved in speeding offences than resident drivers (In France,
>         for instance, their share in traffic
>          is 5.5%, but their share in offences 15%). 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Autoliste mailing list
> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste



More information about the Autoliste mailing list