From raimonds.vilkss at gmail.com Fri Jul 17 11:20:18 2015 From: raimonds.vilkss at gmail.com (Raimonds Vilks) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:20:18 +0300 Subject: [Autoliste] Re: =?utf-8?q?Vecs_jaut=C4=81jums?= In-Reply-To: References: , <2DE9EA2270B6EE4D972B9F5F5460067727C91F72@Exchange.saf.lan>, , <2DE9EA2270B6EE4D972B9F5F5460067727C91F9E@Exchange.saf.lan> Message-ID: <55A8BAC2.9030203@gmail.com> Jeps, po?iem joc?ga lo?ika: sab?v?t b?ni un uz katra zirgu ce?a krustojuma salikt ierobe?ojumus 70. Visu ce?u tik to vien dari, k? ieskrienies un bremz?. Var uzs?sties uz astes viet?jiem, kas uzstut?ju?i r?ciju, tie p?rsvar? uz tiem 70 nerea?? - tur konstantu ?trumu. ramonz, cer a dr?zum? b?s b?nis l?dz War?avai. On 06.07.2015 19:11, J?nis B?rzi?? wrote: > Atbild??u tagad pats, jo sal?dzin?ju abus variantus. > > Komfortabl?k uz Var?avu ir braukt caur Lom?u, diezgan viendab?gs > parasts asfalt?ts ce??, auto > 30t aizliegts, f?ru nav. > Caur Bialostoku ?si b??a posmi mijas ar t?diem posmiem, k?ds 90-tajos > bija viss ce??, daudz 70->50 posmu ar viet?m, kur b?vniec?bas agreg?ti > velkas p?ri, buv? jaunu ce?u blakus. Stresaini. > Waze ar? abos virzienos virz?ja caur Lom?u. > > Ar? aiz Var?avas izm??in?ju 2 variantus: > - turpbraucot uz Berl?ni, j?maks? laikam kop? bija 78 PLN, 160 km/h > visu gabalu; > - atpaka? gar Dr?sdeni, Vroclava, Lodza, biju pat?kami p?rsteigts, > visu ce?u ar? b?nis, ne tik pamat?gs k? A2, bet nav j?maks? nekas, 140 > km/h ar da?iem l?n?kiem posmiem, benz?ntanku pamaz tikai. > > Janis > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: Edgars.Kazaks at saftehnika.com > To: autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 07:15:20 +0000 > Subject: [Autoliste] Re: Vecs jaut?jums > > J?, laikam to luksoforu bij vair?k k? 1ns, bet vi?i ir labi > sasinhroniz?ti un pl?sm? nej?t tos. > > Aaa, v?l piebilde pie iepr. pielikuma - ?trumu un distances grafiks > ir virzien? Katowice>R?ga. (ar +-120km/h es pa LV neskrienu...) ;-) > > edg > > *From:*autoliste-bounces+edgars.kazaks=saftehnika.com at lists.autoliste.lv > [mailto:autoliste-bounces+edgars.kazaks=saftehnika.com at lists.autoliste.lv] > *On Behalf Of *Reinholds Zviedris > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 30, 2015 10:09 AM > *To:* Viss par un ap auto! > *Subject:* [Autoliste] Re: Vecs jaut?jums > > Ah, pareizi - pirms J??iem braucu uz Kau?u, tur p?c Pa?emve?as san?ca > t?ds diezgan pamat?gs posms, kuru remont?ja un bij diezgan padaudz > luksoforu. Tiesa - kop?jais aizkav?jums uz gabalu Pa?eve?a-Kau?a p?c > Wazes san?ca ~30 min. T? k? - ja tie??m nav j?steidzas, tad var > mier?gi braukt pa turieni. > > /Reinis > > 2015-06-30 10:05 GMT+03:00 Edgars Kazaks >: > > M?ne?a s?kum? tika nobraukts ??ds mar?ruts - pielikum?. Vien?g? vieta, > kur bija 1ns remontu luksofors bij Lietuv?. L?dz Katowicei nav maksas > ce?u. Var?av? ir sastr?gumi uz jaun? tranz?tb??a, bet tur nav > luksosforu, tikvien k? no 3 josl?m j?saspie?as uz 1nu. Decembr? b??ot > pabeigts tas b?nis, ta caur Var?avai var?s caurlidot diezgan mier?gi. > Bet brauc vi?i tur pa to Poliju traki - >+30km/h vislaik pa otro > joslu, pa pirmo f?res velkas, izv?le ir diezgan skarba... > > edg > > *From:*autoliste-bounces+edgars.kazaks=saftehnika.com at lists.autoliste.lv > > [mailto:autoliste-bounces+edgars.kazaks > =saftehnika.com at lists.autoliste.lv > ] *On Behalf Of *J?nis B?rzi?? > *Sent:* Monday, June 29, 2015 11:33 PM > *To:* autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv > *Subject:* [Autoliste] Vecs jaut?jums > > Labs vakars (kas vakar? lasa :-) > > Jaut?jums te jau ir bijis kaut kad, bet nekas nav m???gs. > Braucot no R?gas uz Var?avu ar vieglo kur lab?k - > Bialostoka vai Lom?a? > Ja nav rekomend?cijas brauk?u kur waze ved?s. > > J?nis > > > _______________________________________________ Autoliste mailing list > Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv > http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste > > > _______________________________________________ > Autoliste mailing list > Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv > http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: