From Odze at baltinet.lv  Fri Jan 11 10:05:43 2013
From: Odze at baltinet.lv (Odze)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:05:43 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste]
 =?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
Message-ID: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>

 

Labr?t! 

Vai varat, l?dzu, pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d?
policijai ir j?ats?ta APP par ar radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu? 

Man kaut k?
pr?t? palicis, ka t?ds bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :( 

Paldies
jau iepriek?! 

Evija 
 
----------- ???????? ????? -----------
???????? ? ??????? HTML ???? ?????????&hellip;
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/33db7a4e/attachment.html>

From rinalds.egle at gmail.com  Fri Jan 11 09:54:20 2013
From: rinalds.egle at gmail.com (Rinalds Egle)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:54:20 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
	=?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
Message-ID: <CAObdyqBU28s60y1ijKOiTa=XG2O9O1r4ZbimUoOA2rwQaJoDig@mail.gmail.com>

4 meeenshi? kautkaa taa atminjaa palicis...


2013/1/11 Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv>

> **
>
> Labr?t!
>
> Vai varat, l?dzu, pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d? policijai ir
> j?ats?ta APP par ar radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu?
>
> Man kaut k? pr?t? palicis, ka t?ds bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :(
>
> Paldies jau iepriek?!
>
> Evija
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoliste mailing list
> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>
>


-- 
Rinalds
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/49f2e38b/attachment.html>

From viesturs.r at gmail.com  Fri Jan 11 10:15:36 2013
From: viesturs.r at gmail.com (Viesturs.R)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:15:36 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
	=?iso-8859-13?q?Termi=F2=F0_protokola_nos=FBt=EE=F0anai?=
In-Reply-To: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
Message-ID: <CABpJtFVRgsKaFPciy+nTs7RoHZXYQZMZ2HkiTThwdox2Y5srPg@mail.gmail.com>

Iek? e.CSDD.LV paskat?ties konkr?tai ma??nai?
 On 11 Jan 2013 09:50, "Odze" <Odze at baltinet.lv> wrote:

> **
>
> Labr?t!
>
> Vai varat, l?dzu, pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d? policijai ir
> j?ats?ta APP par ar radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu?
>
> Man kaut k? pr?t? palicis, ka t?ds bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :(
>
> Paldies jau iepriek?!
>
> Evija
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoliste mailing list
> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/e52580e2/attachment.html>

From Odze at baltinet.lv  Fri Jan 11 10:35:56 2013
From: Odze at baltinet.lv (Odze)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:35:56 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
 =?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <CABpJtFVRgsKaFPciy+nTs7RoHZXYQZMZ2HkiTThwdox2Y5srPg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CABpJtFVRgsKaFPciy+nTs7RoHZXYQZMZ2HkiTThwdox2Y5srPg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <34af1437418a67aca2f4a192054a563e@webmail.ngn.lv>

 

Tas ??j? gad?jum? nav saist?ts ar konkr?tu ma??nu, bet gan ar to, ka
ir protokoli, kas atn?k 5 dienu laik?, bet ir ar? t?di, kas vair?ku
m?ne?u laik?. 

Evija 

Viesturs.R @ 2013-01-11 10:15 rakst?ja: 

> Iek?
e.CSDD.LV [3] paskat?ties konkr?tai ma??nai? 
> On 11 Jan 2013 09:50,
"Odze" <Odze at baltinet.lv [4]> wrote:
> 
>> Labr?t! 
>> 
>> Vai varat,
l?dzu, pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d? policijai ir j?ats?ta APP
par ar radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu? 
>> 
>> Man kaut k? pr?t? palicis, ka
t?ds bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :( 
>> 
>> Paldies jau iepriek?!

>> 
>> Evija 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>
Autoliste mailing list
>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv [1]
>>
http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste [2]




Links:
------
[1] mailto:Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
[2]
http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
[3]
http://e.CSDD.LV
[4] mailto:Odze at baltinet.lv
----------- ???????? ????? -----------
???????? ? ??????? HTML ???? ?????????&hellip;
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/8f9f6c7a/attachment.html>

From zai at inbox.lv  Fri Jan 11 11:43:17 2013
From: zai at inbox.lv (Imants)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:43:17 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
	=?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
Message-ID: <CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>

Morgen!

Un atbilde...NAV pareiza!

(1) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem izskata 30 dienu laik? p?c
tam, kad iest?de, kas kompetenta izskat?t lietu, sa??musi protokolu par
administrat?vo p?rk?pumu un citus lietas materi?lus.
...
(3) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem ce?u satiksm? izskata un
l?mumu pie?em uzreiz p?c p?rk?puma konstat??anas, ja par ?o p?rk?pumu var
izteikt br?din?jumu vai sankcij? paredz?tais maksim?lais naudas sods
nep?rsniedz simt latus.

(Latvijas Administrat?vo p?rk?pumu kodeksa 270.pants Administrat?vo
p?rk?pumu lietu izskat??anas termi?i)
-------------
Protokolu?l?mumu ne v?l?k k? triju darbdienu laik? p?c t? pie?em?anas
nos?ta transportl?dzek?a re?istr?cijas apliec?b? nor?d?tajam tur?t?jam vai,
ja tur?t?js nav nor?d?ts, ? transportl?dzek?a ?pa?niekam (vald?t?jam).
(Ce?u satiksmes likuma *43.6 pants ?patn?bas administrat?vo p?rk?pumu
liet?s attiec?b? uz p?rk?pumiem, kuri fiks?ti ar tehniskiem l?dzek?iem,
neapturot transportl?dzekli)*


zais,
Subaru ru?evoj!



2013/1/11 Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv>

> **
>
> Labr?t!
>
> Vai varat, l?dzu, pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d? policijai ir
> j?ats?ta APP par ar radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu?
>
> Man kaut k? pr?t? palicis, ka t?ds bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :(
>
> Paldies jau iepriek?!
>
> Evija
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoliste mailing list
> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/de2db845/attachment.html>

From lordramex at gmail.com  Fri Jan 11 11:58:34 2013
From: lordramex at gmail.com (lordramex at gmail.com)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:58:34 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
	=?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>

ja parto cik ?tri VP ir j?izs?ta fotoradara protokols - tad tas ir 4 M?ne?i
no fiks??anas br??a, bija speci?las izmai?as tie?i attiec?b? par
fotoradariem.

M.


2013/1/11 Imants <zai at inbox.lv>

> Morgen!
>
> Un atbilde...NAV pareiza!
>
> (1) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem izskata 30 dienu laik? p?c
> tam, kad iest?de, kas kompetenta izskat?t lietu, sa??musi protokolu par
> administrat?vo p?rk?pumu un citus lietas materi?lus.
> ...
> (3) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem ce?u satiksm? izskata un
> l?mumu pie?em uzreiz p?c p?rk?puma konstat??anas, ja par ?o p?rk?pumu var
> izteikt br?din?jumu vai sankcij? paredz?tais maksim?lais naudas sods
> nep?rsniedz simt latus.
>
> (Latvijas Administrat?vo p?rk?pumu kodeksa 270.pants Administrat?vo
> p?rk?pumu lietu izskat??anas termi?i)
> -------------
> Protokolu?l?mumu ne v?l?k k? triju darbdienu laik? p?c t? pie?em?anas
> nos?ta transportl?dzek?a re?istr?cijas apliec?b? nor?d?tajam tur?t?jam vai,
> ja tur?t?js nav nor?d?ts, ? transportl?dzek?a ?pa?niekam (vald?t?jam).
> (Ce?u satiksmes likuma *43.6 pants ?patn?bas administrat?vo p?rk?pumu
> liet?s attiec?b? uz p?rk?pumiem, kuri fiks?ti ar tehniskiem l?dzek?iem,
> neapturot transportl?dzekli)*
>
>
> zais,
> Subaru ru?evoj!
>
>
>
> 2013/1/11 Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv>
>
>>  **
>>
>> Labr?t!
>>
>> Vai varat, l?dzu, pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d? policijai ir
>> j?ats?ta APP par ar radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu?
>>
>> Man kaut k? pr?t? palicis, ka t?ds bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :(
>>
>> Paldies jau iepriek?!
>>
>> Evija
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Autoliste mailing list
>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
>> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoliste mailing list
> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/d4d147a8/attachment.html>

From Odze at baltinet.lv  Fri Jan 11 12:32:57 2013
From: Odze at baltinet.lv (Odze)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:32:57 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
 =?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e7688068f443c5de1ca624c2fd55b2e8@webmail.ngn.lv>

 

Un kur tie 4 m?ne?i ir noteikti? 

Par to, ka l?mumu nos?ta 3 dienu
laik?, ?aubu nav, bet ?aubas rada ??di datumi: 

- p?rk?puma fik??sanas
datums - 10.07.2012. 

- l?muma datums - 28.09.2012. 

man ir aizdomas,
ka 270.pants ?aj? gad?jum? ?sti neder?s, jo ir divi nenoteikti lielumi:


1) sa??musi protokolu par administrat?vo p?rk?pumu un citus lietas
materi?lus - cik ?tri info nos?t?ja radaru firma vai CSDD nav l?mum?
redzams; 

2) l?mumu pie?em uzreiz p?c p?rk?puma konstat??anas - t?tad
ar? sa?em?anas, jo policija jau p?rk?pumu nekonstat?ja un atkal
nenoteikts lielums. 

Evija 

lordramex at gmail.com @ 2013-01-11 11:58
rakst?ja: 

> ja parto cik ?tri VP ir j?izs?ta fotoradara protokols -
tad tas ir 4 M?ne?i no fiks??anas br??a, bija speci?las izmai?as tie?i
attiec?b? par fotoradariem. 
> M. 
> 
> 2013/1/11 Imants <zai at inbox.lv
[6]>
> 
>> Morgen! 
>> Un atbilde...NAV pareiza! 
>> 
>> (1) Lietas par
administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem izskata 30 dienu laik? p?c tam, kad
iest?de, kas kompetenta izskat?t lietu, sa??musi protokolu par
administrat?vo p?rk?pumu un citus lietas materi?lus. 
>> ... 
>> (3)
Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem ce?u satiksm? izskata un
l?mumu pie?em uzreiz p?c p?rk?puma konstat??anas, ja par ?o p?rk?pumu
var izteikt br?din?jumu vai sankcij? paredz?tais maksim?lais naudas sods
nep?rsniedz simt latus. 
>> (Latvijas Administrat?vo p?rk?pumu kodeksa
270.pants Administrat?vo p?rk?pumu lietu izskat??anas termi?i) 
>>
------------- 
>> Protokolu-l?mumu ne v?l?k k? triju darbdienu laik? p?c
t? pie?em?anas nos?ta transportl?dzek?a re?istr?cijas apliec?b?
nor?d?tajam tur?t?jam vai, ja tur?t?js nav nor?d?ts, --
transportl?dzek?a ?pa?niekam (vald?t?jam). 
>> (Ce?u satiksmes likuma
43.6 PANTS ?PATN?BAS ADMINISTRAT?VO P?RK?PUMU LIET?S ATTIEC?B? UZ
P?RK?PUMIEM, KURI FIKS?TI AR TEHNISKIEM L?DZEK?IEM, NEAPTUROT
TRANSPORTL?DZEKLI) 
>> 
>> zais, 
>> Subaru ru?evoj!
>> 
>> 2013/1/11
Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv [3]>
>> 
>>> Labr?t! 
>>> 
>>> Vai varat, l?dzu,
pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d? policijai ir j?ats?ta APP par ar
radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu? 
>>> 
>>> Man kaut k? pr?t? palicis, ka t?ds
bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :( 
>>> 
>>> Paldies jau iepriek?!

>>> 
>>> Evija 
>>> 
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> Autoliste mailing
list
>>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv [1]
>>>
http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste [2]
>> 
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Autoliste mailing
list
>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv [4]
>>
http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste [5]




Links:
------
[1] mailto:Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
[2]
http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
[3]
mailto:Odze at baltinet.lv
[4] mailto:Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
[5]
http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
[6]
mailto:zai at inbox.lv
----------- ???????? ????? -----------
???????? ? ??????? HTML ???? ?????????&hellip;
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/8b2f1320/attachment.html>

From martini.zupa at gmail.com  Fri Jan 11 12:18:13 2013
From: martini.zupa at gmail.com (Martins)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:18:13 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
	=?iso-8859-13?q?Termi=F2=F0_protokola_nos=FBt=EE=F0anai?=
In-Reply-To: <CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHSLF7cSWkWoF5DmsnHkfc9zQ+ZHgw=vTHy=4eMBHepwrf6h1Q@mail.gmail.com>

Prakse: p?d?jie protokoli pien?ca ?oti ?tri, tie kas p?c pirm? Vitronic
darb?bas p?rtraukuma bija izs?t?mi


2013/1/11 lordramex at gmail.com <lordramex at gmail.com>

>
>
> ja parto cik ?tri VP ir j?izs?ta fotoradara protokols - tad tas ir 4
> M?ne?i no fiks??anas br??a, bija speci?las izmai?as tie?i attiec?b? par
> fotoradariem.
>
> M.
>
>
> 2013/1/11 Imants <zai at inbox.lv>
>
>> Morgen!
>>
>> Un atbilde...NAV pareiza!
>>
>> (1) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem izskata 30 dienu laik? p?c
>> tam, kad iest?de, kas kompetenta izskat?t lietu, sa??musi protokolu par
>> administrat?vo p?rk?pumu un citus lietas materi?lus.
>> ...
>> (3) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem ce?u satiksm? izskata un
>> l?mumu pie?em uzreiz p?c p?rk?puma konstat??anas, ja par ?o p?rk?pumu var
>> izteikt br?din?jumu vai sankcij? paredz?tais maksim?lais naudas sods
>> nep?rsniedz simt latus.
>>
>> (Latvijas Administrat?vo p?rk?pumu kodeksa 270.pants Administrat?vo
>> p?rk?pumu lietu izskat??anas termi?i)
>> -------------
>> Protokolu-l?mumu ne v?l?k k? triju darbdienu laik? p?c t? pie?em?anas
>> nos?ta transportl?dzek?a re?istr?cijas apliec?b? nor?d?tajam tur?t?jam vai,
>> ja tur?t?js nav nor?d?ts, -- transportl?dzek?a ?pa?niekam (vald?t?jam).
>> (Ce?u satiksmes likuma *43.6 pants ?patn?bas administrat?vo p?rk?pumu
>> liet?s attiec?b? uz p?rk?pumiem, kuri fiks?ti ar tehniskiem l?dzek?iem,
>> neapturot transportl?dzekli)*
>>
>>
>> zais,
>> Subaru ru?evoj!
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/1/11 Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv>
>>
>>>  **
>>>
>>> Labr?t!
>>>
>>> Vai varat, l?dzu, pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d? policijai ir
>>> j?ats?ta APP par ar radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu?
>>>
>>> Man kaut k? pr?t? palicis, ka t?ds bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :(
>>>
>>> Paldies jau iepriek?!
>>>
>>> Evija
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Autoliste mailing list
>>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
>>> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Autoliste mailing list
>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
>> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoliste mailing list
> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/1183ea3c/attachment.html>

From lordramex at gmail.com  Fri Jan 11 12:20:07 2013
From: lordramex at gmail.com (lordramex at gmail.com)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:20:07 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
	=?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <e7688068f443c5de1ca624c2fd55b2e8@webmail.ngn.lv>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<e7688068f443c5de1ca624c2fd55b2e8@webmail.ngn.lv>
Message-ID: <CA+mPWc_5TEYo1FvU4UZM21uKUhARppe8Gv4kj1VhVxga8pJUrw@mail.gmail.com>

*Kv?tis par l?dz?in?jo fotoradaru fiks?tajiem p?rk?pumiem transportl?dzek?u
tur?t?ji (?pa?nieki) parasti sa??ma vienas l?dz divu ned??u laik?. L?dz ar
jauno fotoradaru ievie?anu termi?? pagarin?ts ? atbilsto?i administrat?vo
p?rk?pumu kodeksam soda kv?ti automa??nas ?pa?niekam j?izs?ta ?etru m?ne?u
laik? kop? p?rk?puma fiks??anas br??a. Tom?r ar? pa?laik kv?ti nog?d? auto
saimniekam vid?ji divu ned??u laik?, nor?da Zivti??. Savuk?rt sods
j?samaks? 30 dienu laik? no pav?stes sa?em?anas br??a.*
*
*
*
http://www.tvnet.lv/auto/satiksme/405109-zivtins_fotoradari_sevi_ir_attaisnojusi
*
*
*
*
*
Pirmais ko ?trum? atradu

M.

2013/1/11 Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv>

> **
>
> Un kur tie 4 m?ne?i ir noteikti?
>
> Par to, ka l?mumu nos?ta 3 dienu laik?, ?aubu nav, bet ?aubas rada ??di
> datumi:
>
> - p?rk?puma fik??sanas datums - 10.07.2012.
>
> - l?muma datums - 28.09.2012.
>
> man ir aizdomas, ka 270.pants ?aj? gad?jum? ?sti neder?s, jo ir divi
> nenoteikti lielumi:
>
> 1) sa??musi protokolu par administrat?vo p?rk?pumu un citus lietas
> materi?lus - cik ?tri info nos?t?ja radaru firma vai CSDD nav l?mum?
> redzams;
>
> 2) l?mumu pie?em uzreiz p?c p?rk?puma konstat??anas - t?tad ar?
> sa?em?anas, jo policija jau p?rk?pumu nekonstat?ja un atkal nenoteikts
> lielums.
>
> Evija
>
>
>
> lordramex at gmail.com @ 2013-01-11 11:58 rakst?ja:
>
>
> ja parto cik ?tri VP ir j?izs?ta fotoradara protokols - tad tas ir 4
> M?ne?i no fiks??anas br??a, bija speci?las izmai?as tie?i attiec?b? par
> fotoradariem.
> M.
>
>
> 2013/1/11 Imants <zai at inbox.lv>
>
>> Morgen!
>> Un atbilde...NAV pareiza!
>>  (1) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem izskata 30 dienu laik?
>> p?c tam, kad iest?de, kas kompetenta izskat?t lietu, sa??musi protokolu par
>> administrat?vo p?rk?pumu un citus lietas materi?lus.
>> ...
>> (3) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem ce?u satiksm? izskata un
>> l?mumu pie?em uzreiz p?c p?rk?puma konstat??anas, ja par ?o p?rk?pumu var
>> izteikt br?din?jumu vai sankcij? paredz?tais maksim?lais naudas sods
>> nep?rsniedz simt latus.
>>  (Latvijas Administrat?vo p?rk?pumu kodeksa 270.pants Administrat?vo
>> p?rk?pumu lietu izskat??anas termi?i)
>> -------------
>> Protokolu?l?mumu ne v?l?k k? triju darbdienu laik? p?c t? pie?em?anas
>> nos?ta transportl?dzek?a re?istr?cijas apliec?b? nor?d?tajam tur?t?jam vai,
>> ja tur?t?js nav nor?d?ts, ? transportl?dzek?a ?pa?niekam (vald?t?jam).
>> (Ce?u satiksmes likuma *43.6 pants ?patn?bas administrat?vo p?rk?pumu
>> liet?s attiec?b? uz p?rk?pumiem, kuri fiks?ti ar tehniskiem l?dzek?iem,
>> neapturot transportl?dzekli)*
>>
>>
>> zais,
>> Subaru ru?evoj!
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/1/11 Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv>
>>
>>>   Labr?t!
>>>
>>> Vai varat, l?dzu, pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d? policijai ir
>>> j?ats?ta APP par ar radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu?
>>>
>>> Man kaut k? pr?t? palicis, ka t?ds bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :(
>>>
>>> Paldies jau iepriek?!
>>>
>>> Evija
>>>
>>>   _______________________________________________
>>> Autoliste mailing list
>>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
>>> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Autoliste mailing list
>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
>> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoliste mailing list
> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/78ee13e4/attachment.html>

From richlv at nakts.net  Fri Jan 11 12:21:07 2013
From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:21:07 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
 =?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <CAHSLF7cSWkWoF5DmsnHkfc9zQ+ZHgw=vTHy=4eMBHepwrf6h1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHSLF7cSWkWoF5DmsnHkfc9zQ+ZHgw=vTHy=4eMBHepwrf6h1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <50EFE793.1060500@nakts.net>

On 2013-01-11 12:18, Martins wrote:
> Prakse: p?d?jie protokoli pien?ca ?oti ?tri, tie kas p?c pirm? Vitronic
> darb?bas p?rtraukuma bija izs?t?mi

btw, kur tie radari tagad ir ?
ieziemoti ?

> 2013/1/11 lordramex at gmail.com <mailto:lordramex at gmail.com>
> <lordramex at gmail.com <mailto:lordramex at gmail.com>>
...
-- 
  Rich


From lordramex at gmail.com  Fri Jan 11 12:24:09 2013
From: lordramex at gmail.com (lordramex at gmail.com)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:24:09 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
	=?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <50EFE793.1060500@nakts.net>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHSLF7cSWkWoF5DmsnHkfc9zQ+ZHgw=vTHy=4eMBHepwrf6h1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<50EFE793.1060500@nakts.net>
Message-ID: <CA+mPWc8panDAYAmnQyQJhh697cPYkKTWNLFnLVSwKSR5zSK1BA@mail.gmail.com>

gan jau ka st?v vtrafika noliktav? un kr?j putek?us :)

M.

2013/1/11 Rich <richlv at nakts.net>

> On 2013-01-11 12:18, Martins wrote:
>
>> Prakse: p?d?jie protokoli pien?ca ?oti ?tri, tie kas p?c pirm? Vitronic
>> darb?bas p?rtraukuma bija izs?t?mi
>>
>
> btw, kur tie radari tagad ir ?
> ieziemoti ?
>
>  2013/1/11 lordramex at gmail.com <mailto:lordramex at gmail.com>
>> <lordramex at gmail.com <mailto:lordramex at gmail.com>>
>>
> ...
> --
>  Rich
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Autoliste mailing list
> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
> http://lists.autoliste.lv/**mailman/listinfo/autoliste<http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/9bf8f7e4/attachment.html>

From zai at inbox.lv  Fri Jan 11 13:09:53 2013
From: zai at inbox.lv (Imants)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:09:53 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
	=?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <CA+mPWc_5TEYo1FvU4UZM21uKUhARppe8Gv4kj1VhVxga8pJUrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<e7688068f443c5de1ca624c2fd55b2e8@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CA+mPWc_5TEYo1FvU4UZM21uKUhARppe8Gv4kj1VhVxga8pJUrw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEffQRDtgy+-6=7cp1NLeP6OWC_t3GATSzH3UfL7eneGGq1kXQ@mail.gmail.com>

Un atkal neprec?za (novecojusi) info.


LAPK *37.panta Administrat?v? soda uzlik?anas termi?i pirm? da?a*

Administrat?vo sodu var uzlikt ne v?l?k k? ?etru m?ne?u laik? no p?rk?puma
izdar??anas dienas, bet, ja p?rk?pums ir ilgsto?s, - ?etru m?ne?u laik? no
t? atkl??anas dienas. Ja liet? nepiecie?ams sa?emt eksperta atzinumu,
administrat?vo sodu var uzlikt ne v?l?k k? se?u m?ne?u laik? no p?rk?puma
izdar??anas vai atkl??anas dienas.
(??da panta redakcija bija sp?k? l?dz 2012.gada 1.j?lijam)

Tagad panta da?a skan ??di: Lietved?bu administrat?v? p?rk?puma liet? var
uzs?kt ne v?l?k k? se?u m?ne?u laik? no p?rk?puma izdar??anas dienas, bet,
ja p?rk?pums ir ilgsto?s, ? no p?rk?puma p?rtrauk?anas dienas.


zais,
pieGdienas spameris

2013/1/11 lordramex at gmail.com <lordramex at gmail.com>

> *Kv?tis par l?dz?in?jo fotoradaru fiks?tajiem p?rk?pumiem
> transportl?dzek?u tur?t?ji (?pa?nieki) parasti sa??ma vienas l?dz divu
> ned??u laik?. L?dz ar jauno fotoradaru ievie?anu termi?? pagarin?ts ?
> atbilsto?i administrat?vo p?rk?pumu kodeksam soda kv?ti automa??nas
> ?pa?niekam j?izs?ta ?etru m?ne?u laik? kop? p?rk?puma fiks??anas br??a.
> Tom?r ar? pa?laik kv?ti nog?d? auto saimniekam vid?ji divu ned??u laik?,
> nor?da Zivti??. Savuk?rt sods j?samaks? 30 dienu laik? no pav?stes
> sa?em?anas br??a.*
> *
> *
> *
> http://www.tvnet.lv/auto/satiksme/405109-zivtins_fotoradari_sevi_ir_attaisnojusi
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> Pirmais ko ?trum? atradu
>
> M.
>
> 2013/1/11 Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv>
>
>> **
>>
>> Un kur tie 4 m?ne?i ir noteikti?
>>
>> Par to, ka l?mumu nos?ta 3 dienu laik?, ?aubu nav, bet ?aubas rada ??di
>> datumi:
>>
>> - p?rk?puma fik??sanas datums - 10.07.2012.
>>
>> - l?muma datums - 28.09.2012.
>>
>> man ir aizdomas, ka 270.pants ?aj? gad?jum? ?sti neder?s, jo ir divi
>> nenoteikti lielumi:
>>
>> 1) sa??musi protokolu par administrat?vo p?rk?pumu un citus lietas
>> materi?lus - cik ?tri info nos?t?ja radaru firma vai CSDD nav l?mum?
>> redzams;
>>
>> 2) l?mumu pie?em uzreiz p?c p?rk?puma konstat??anas - t?tad ar?
>> sa?em?anas, jo policija jau p?rk?pumu nekonstat?ja un atkal nenoteikts
>> lielums.
>>
>> Evija
>>
>>
>>
>> lordramex at gmail.com @ 2013-01-11 11:58 rakst?ja:
>>
>>
>> ja parto cik ?tri VP ir j?izs?ta fotoradara protokols - tad tas ir 4
>> M?ne?i no fiks??anas br??a, bija speci?las izmai?as tie?i attiec?b? par
>> fotoradariem.
>> M.
>>
>>
>> 2013/1/11 Imants <zai at inbox.lv>
>>
>>> Morgen!
>>> Un atbilde...NAV pareiza!
>>>  (1) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem izskata 30 dienu laik?
>>> p?c tam, kad iest?de, kas kompetenta izskat?t lietu, sa??musi protokolu par
>>> administrat?vo p?rk?pumu un citus lietas materi?lus.
>>> ...
>>> (3) Lietas par administrat?vajiem p?rk?pumiem ce?u satiksm? izskata un
>>> l?mumu pie?em uzreiz p?c p?rk?puma konstat??anas, ja par ?o p?rk?pumu var
>>> izteikt br?din?jumu vai sankcij? paredz?tais maksim?lais naudas sods
>>> nep?rsniedz simt latus.
>>>  (Latvijas Administrat?vo p?rk?pumu kodeksa 270.pants Administrat?vo
>>> p?rk?pumu lietu izskat??anas termi?i)
>>> -------------
>>> Protokolu?l?mumu ne v?l?k k? triju darbdienu laik? p?c t? pie?em?anas
>>> nos?ta transportl?dzek?a re?istr?cijas apliec?b? nor?d?tajam tur?t?jam vai,
>>> ja tur?t?js nav nor?d?ts, ? transportl?dzek?a ?pa?niekam (vald?t?jam).
>>> (Ce?u satiksmes likuma *43.6 pants ?patn?bas administrat?vo p?rk?pumu
>>> liet?s attiec?b? uz p?rk?pumiem, kuri fiks?ti ar tehniskiem l?dzek?iem,
>>> neapturot transportl?dzekli)*
>>>
>>>
>>> zais,
>>> Subaru ru?evoj!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/1/11 Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv>
>>>
>>>>   Labr?t!
>>>>
>>>> Vai varat, l?dzu, pateikt, kur bija noteikts termi?? k?d? policijai ir
>>>> j?ats?ta APP par ar radaru fiks?tu p?rk?pumu?
>>>>
>>>> Man kaut k? pr?t? palicis, ka t?ds bija, bet tagad ?sti nevaru atrast :(
>>>>
>>>> Paldies jau iepriek?!
>>>>
>>>> Evija
>>>>
>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>> Autoliste mailing list
>>>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
>>>> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Autoliste mailing list
>>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
>>> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Autoliste mailing list
>> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
>> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoliste mailing list
> Autoliste at lists.autoliste.lv
> http://lists.autoliste.lv/mailman/listinfo/autoliste
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.autoliste.lv/pipermail/autoliste/attachments/20130111/d25c444f/attachment.html>

From richlv at nakts.net  Fri Jan 11 13:30:27 2013
From: richlv at nakts.net (Rich)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:30:27 +0200
Subject: [Autoliste] Re:
 =?utf-8?b?VGVybWnFhsWhIHByb3Rva29sYSBub3PFq3TEq8WhYW5haQ==?=
In-Reply-To: <CAEffQRDtgy+-6=7cp1NLeP6OWC_t3GATSzH3UfL7eneGGq1kXQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c0e2c6a66f5183d0b93fa36b3e9f8fd@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CAEffQRAJAqUtsWiozgNuPkuxxBXEBdkQ4CD=bRxrF0RvO7g2Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+mPWc910DFtAGen_b2wEd5iS1wcvo_nHwbcziP3-TdVv0WWTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<e7688068f443c5de1ca624c2fd55b2e8@webmail.ngn.lv>
	<CA+mPWc_5TEYo1FvU4UZM21uKUhARppe8Gv4kj1VhVxga8pJUrw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEffQRDtgy+-6=7cp1NLeP6OWC_t3GATSzH3UfL7eneGGq1kXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <50EFF7D3.2030202@nakts.net>

On 2013-01-11 13:09, Imants wrote:
> Un atkal neprec?za (novecojusi) info.
>
>
> LAPK *37.panta Administrat?v? soda uzlik?anas termi?i pirm? da?a*
>
> Administrat?vo sodu var uzlikt ne v?l?k k? ?etru m?ne?u laik? no
> p?rk?puma izdar??anas dienas, bet, ja p?rk?pums ir ilgsto?s, - ?etru
> m?ne?u laik? no t? atkl??anas dienas. Ja liet? nepiecie?ams sa?emt
> eksperta atzinumu, administrat?vo sodu var uzlikt ne v?l?k k? se?u
> m?ne?u laik? no p?rk?puma izdar??anas vai atkl??anas dienas.
>
> (??da panta redakcija bija sp?k? l?dz 2012.gada 1.j?lijam)
>
> Tagad panta da?a skan ??di: Lietved?bu administrat?v? p?rk?puma liet?
> var uzs?kt ne v?l?k k? se?u m?ne?u laik? no p?rk?puma izdar??anas
> dienas, bet, ja p?rk?pums ir ilgsto?s, ? no p?rk?puma p?rtrauk?anas dienas.

tas noziimee, ka ir limits tikai uzsaakshanai, bet lietvediiba var buut 
muuzhiiga ? :)

> zais,
> pieGdienas spameris
>
> 2013/1/11 lordramex at gmail.com <mailto:lordramex at gmail.com>
> <lordramex at gmail.com <mailto:lordramex at gmail.com>>
>
>     /Kv?tis par l?dz?in?jo fotoradaru fiks?tajiem p?rk?pumiem
>     transportl?dzek?u tur?t?ji (?pa?nieki) parasti sa??ma vienas l?dz
>     divu ned??u laik?. L?dz ar jauno fotoradaru ievie?anu termi??
>     pagarin?ts ? atbilsto?i administrat?vo p?rk?pumu kodeksam soda kv?ti
>     automa??nas ?pa?niekam j?izs?ta ?etru m?ne?u laik? kop? p?rk?puma
>     fiks??anas br??a. Tom?r ar? pa?laik kv?ti nog?d? auto saimniekam
>     vid?ji divu ned??u laik?, nor?da Zivti??. Savuk?rt sods j?samaks? 30
>     dienu laik? no pav?stes sa?em?anas br??a./
>     /
>     /
>     /http://www.tvnet.lv/auto/satiksme/405109-zivtins_fotoradari_sevi_ir_attaisnojusi/
>     /
>     /
>     /
>     /
>     Pirmais ko ?trum? atradu
>
>     M.
>
>     2013/1/11 Odze <Odze at baltinet.lv <mailto:Odze at baltinet.lv>>
...
-- 
  Rich